This week I've been working a lot on GPT in Testgenai.com. I am learning more and more about Laravel as a side effect.
During browsing open-source projects written in Laravel, I've noticed the syntax I have been dreaming of since I started to use invokable controllers. What was it? Can it make code cleaner or more complex? I asked on Twitter and got such a variety of replies, that it deserves a blog post.
The following architecture makes entry points much clearer - single action controllers:
final class ProcessPhpFormController extends Controller
{
public function __invoke(Request $request)
{
}
}
These classes have... eh, exactly 1 action. Like console command has one purpose, and like event subscribers has a purpose. It makes the controller much easier to maintain.
This architecture allows us to refer to the controller route directly in /routes/web.php
:
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route;
Route::post('/process-php-form', ProcessPhpFormController::class);
We can use IDE to get to the controller class instantly. This feature is available in most PHP frameworks.
Before we jump into routing, I want to give you some context and set the boundaries. Many years ago, we used to use get element by its reference. Do you want to get the App\Security\SecurityGuard
service? Name it in the config and then call:
// in Laravel
$securityGuard = app()->make('security_guard');
// or in Symfony
$securityGuard = $this->get('security_guard');
Then a tiny but powerful feature came in PHP 5.5 - a reference to class by a *::class
notation. It might have sparked movement from string references to *::class
references - ergo, direct fetch.
Also, if there is just one exact instance of security_guard
with an exclusive class of App\Security\SecurityGuard
, why not use it directly and explicitly? IDE, PHPStan, and Rector will thank us:
use App\Security\SecurityGuard;
// in Laravel
$securityGuard = app()->make(SecurityGuard::class);
// or in Symfony
$securityGuard = $this->get(SecurityGuard::class);
This is typical today, and we don't think about it anymore - we always use App\Security\SecurityGuard
as a reference, in a constructor or during injections.
Context is loaded, so now we get back to routing.
to_route()
The routing is an array of urls that point to specific controllers, and an URL is a string that references a specific controller class.
At the top of this post, we defined a controller action that handles submitted forms via POST.
Typical usage is in <form>
tag:
<form action="{{ route('...') }}" method="post">
Oh, we forgot something. To use route()
, we have to add a route name:
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route;
Route::post('/process-php-form', ProcessPhpFormController::class)
->name('process_form');
Then we use the string in our template:
<form action="{{ route('process_form') }}" method="post">
After the form is processed, we can redirect it back to the homepage with the following:
final class ProcessPhpFormController extends Controller
{
public function __invoke(Request $request)
{
// process form
return to_route('homepage');
}
}
Now we have 2 made up strings: "homepage" and "process_form"... or was it "process-form"?
This approach can lead to typos, but you can avoid that by using constants:
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route;
Route::post('/process-php-form', ProcessPhpFormController::class)
->name(RouteName::PROCESS_FORM);
Route::post('/', HomepageController::class)
->name(RouteName::HOMEPAGE);
That's a lot of code for a single redirect to a single controller. Where are we now?
RouteName
references that refer to stringsI've been in this situation for years because of confirmation bias: "I like what I use because I have used it for a long time and I like it."
There is no comparison, A-B testing, or rational thinking. My brain is lazy and comfortable and chooses a known path over anything else.
When we face unknown new way and known comfortable suffering,
we often choose to suffer because we are used to it.
Just a friendly reminder - service name was once in the past a reference to class:
-$securityGuard = app()->make('security_guard');
+$securityGuard = app()->make(\App\Security\SecurityGuard::class);
to_action()
A week ago, I noticed a tiny function in one Laravel project - an action()
function.
It allows using the controller directly instead of a middleman string:
-<form action="{{ route('process_form') }}" method="post">
+<form action="{{ action(\App\Controllers\ProcessPhpFormController::class) }}" method="post">
This is where Blade design becomes super helpful - it's a PHP code, so we can:
How about the redirects in the controller?
final class ProcessPhpFormController extends Controller
{
public function __invoke(Request $request)
{
// process form
return redirect()->action(HomepageController::class);
}
}
That was easy!
Last but not least, we can drop the whole RouteName
and named routes mechanism:
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route;
+Route::post('/process-php-form', ProcessPhpFormController::class);
-Route::post('/process-php-form', ProcessPhpFormController::class)
- ->name(RouteName::PROCESS_FORM);
+Route::get('/', HomepageController::class);
-Route::get('/', HomepageController::class)
- ->name(RouteName::HOMEPAGE);
By moving from reference to an exact value, we can drop a whole 1/3 of complexity and logic:
routes.php
- super useful for code reviews or reading an open-source codeTip: you can create your own or open-sourced to_action()
function.
use Illuminate\Http\RedirectResponse;
use Illuminate\Routing\Controller;
use Illuminate\Routing\Redirector;
/**
* @param class-string<Controller> $action
* @param array<string, mixed> $parameters
*/
function to_action(string $action, array $parameters = []): RedirectResponse
{
/** @var Redirector $redirector */
$redirector = redirect();
return $redirector->action($action, $parameters);
}
Happy coding!
Do you learn from my contents or use open-source packages like Rector every day?
Consider supporting it on GitHub Sponsors.
I'd really appreciate it!